When I turn on my computer it pops me this message: WerFault. The memory could not be written. Click on OK to terminate the program. Please i need help today. Ive tried all the things other posts are saying andnothing happend. This thread is locked. You can follow the question or vote as helpful, but you cannot reply to this thread. I have the same question Report abuse.
Details required :. Finally, click OK and reboot your computer. Step 1 : Rightclick the Start button and choose Device Manager from the menu. Step 2 : In the interface of Device Manager, find and expand Display adapters. Then right-click the display driver under this section, and choose Uninstall device from the context menu. Step 3 : After finishing uninstalling the display driver, click Action tab from the top panel, then choose Scan for hardware changes.
After activating this option, Device Manager will reinstall the latest missing hardware with the newest version. These are all the methods provided for you to fix WerFault. Have you successfully removed it? Download Partition Wizard. Quick Navigation : What is WerFault. Except, sometimes that very same system itself goes wrong! So what can you do about the dreaded Werfault. As mentioned above,Werfault. It acts as the go-between for applications that encounter errors and the Microsoft operating system.
Werfault is the error reporting process that manages the logging and transmission of application errors. If the error only happens when you run one specific application, then chances are that the problem is with that application and not Werfault itself. So why does Werfault go wrong? The reasons vary, but based on anecdotal reports and the various fixes that seem to work, there are a few common threads:.
The suggested fixes below are all based around one of these causes or at least ones that are somewhat related to them. Everyone should know this basic troubleshooting step. In many cases the problem will go away after a simple restart. Viruses and other malware sometimes disguise themselves by giving the executable process a name very similar to a legitimate program. Otherwise you could try using ProcExp to try to figure it out. We don't even know which "application" is crashing.
I was going to tell you that in my IE11 iexplore. Since WerFault. Since the message does not indicate any other program or process, I think it logically must be the latter, that the program WerFault. The instruction addresses and memory addresses do not usually make sense without a particular application or program, since each program process has its own address space, and the instruction address 0xa8 e.
So I conclude that this message means that an instruction belonging to the WerFault. More on that below. Still there is another possibility, that the addresses are physical addresses, not virtual addresses. But it is usually not informative to learn that an instruction in a particular physical memory location is making an incorrect or unsuccessful memory access.
It would be extremely difficult to find out what application to fix. So I assume that the instruction addresses are virtual addresses. But nowadays even virtual addresses are not as informative as they used to. There is a specific type of "vulnerability", or security weakness, where attackers provide malicious data to programs that fail to validate their inputs properly and allow buffer overflows t happen.
Attackers carefully craft the input to overflow the program's buffers, overwriting subroutine return addresses with pointers to code contained in the input. This code will make calls to routines in the program.
But the attacker needs to know the addresses of the routines he wants to call. Nowadays this is thwarted by "address space randomization". Each time a program is run, the routines are loaded to different places in the virtual address space. But then the information given in this message becomes meaningless.
Not all programs use such randomization, and I have not checked if Microsoft is using this technique. Therefore, it is possible that the message is meaningful, if randomization is not used.
Now, assuming that the instruction address is meaningful, what is this error message actually telling?
0コメント