Children rapidly image is likely to be quite ine-grained. This visceral sense of the ; see also Harter, ; Harter, Chapter self as a physical object having body parts 31, this volume. For example, by second grade A large body of research has examined cept being studied is a set of ratings. Indeed, this assumption. Some that one's self matters and that one's efforts focus on macro-level contexts, especially the can produce results.
Third, the aspects experimental priming techniques see, e. Contexts can also in the moment. Finally context cally congruent with it. Self, Self-Concept, and Identity 77 that they are not viewed as Americans may identities.
British undergraduates reported choose to act in ways that help them it in. Similar being associated with it has proven difficult. Friendship behavior. Each of these paradigms ous or undermined identity, these authors shifts responses, but the speciic nature of randomly assigned Asian American college the consequences of making the self salient student participants to either be welcomed for action depends on the interplay between to the study without comment or to first be which aspects of the self are brought to mind queried as to whether they were American.
The results of ing 4 either subliminally or supraliminally this experimental manipulation of identity with a variety of cover stories. Perhaps one of the reasons that few self-rating Studies 3 and 4. Stability can be assumed to emerge from self-views and so are a promising trend for early plasticity; that is, social contexts may the ield.
Another possibility is to if self and identity change, people can still subtly prime a particular behavior as either have an experience of stability, so self-report relevant or irrelevant to a core identity such may not be helpful. Self, Self-Concept, and Identity 79 of a ship whose owner mends and repairs it, e.
Eventually all tency of individuals over time Aioise, ; the planks are replaced. Is it the same ship? Depending on what the questioner means, Once established, the notion of essences the answer could be "yes" or "no. People and identity do their job. But at the same time, like the sal although whether people use adjectives ever-changing planks, what self and identity or action verbs to describe their traits, and mean may be dynamically constructed. Thus, a feeling of stability can emerge Is the Self Stable?
Separate from people's perceptions, it seems reasonable to ask whether the self is a stable mental construct. The assumption For example, Serpe 1 found feed their young mashed-up food.
By age 5 that college students did not vary in how they children infer that both biological e. After trying on various vidual differences in self-stability, and these possibilities, adolescents and young adults differences should be consequential. Feeling that the behavior. Researchers focus Bohus, Researchers ; Waterman, Indeed, these theories 1 9 8 5. Similar stability i s inferred from have generally failed to ind support when longitudinal and cross-sectional studies.
For example, research on racial and relationships, and problem solving. They ment, as would be predicted by the theory also show some fluctuation, such that higher e. If the researchers had only Even though lay and theoretical perspectives measured the number of "me" responses, focus on stability, it is possible that a stable these results would support the prediction self is not necessarily an effective self. To that self-concept is stable. The manipulation and internal motivation environment.
The did influence speed of response. Participants appearance of stability in empirical studies made to feel similar to others were faster to may be deceptive. What comes to mind quickly may well ing on how they are assessed. Yet if the goal of research is to make they are context-dependent. Effects over time. They were then to high school. In another study similarity e. The manipulation did behavior. These studies clearly demonstrate that self They chose just as many similarity words and identity matter for behavior, but do they and just as many difference words as "me" also mean that self and identity are basically whether they had just experienced their stable and not context sensitive?
But it could allow inferences about context sensitivity or also be that people dynamically create a new context insensitivity. Marree, At worst, the self may not matter successful. Compared to no-comparison at all. A main tension is between reported more positive self-ratings e. Effects were rials about a 'superstar' student or not, and less clear for girls, who seemed more likely then judge their current and future selves. Indeed, students in the superstar One possibility is that the girls were more condition did rate their current self more likely to perceive themselves as connected negatively.
However, these same students and related to others i. Effects were in ate question is under what circumstances the same direction but weaker for men. Consider the social context of participants' relational self-concept sample school. If people routinely condition or a no-comparison control. However, what ties and consequently judge themselves quite previously seemed to be a gender effect was positively.
Oyserman and colleagues , really a relational self-concept effect. Academic identities were trol no-comparison condition. To address these issues, focus on differences between themselves and we return to the notion that thinking is for others. The reverse occurred after circling doing and articulate what is known about the words we, our, and us in a paragraph social cognition as relevant to the task of or unscrambling sentences including these predicting how and when contexts construct words; then participants were quicker to online identities, and how these identities focus on similarities between themselves and shape behavior.
When primed to consider themselves relationally, participants included negative as well as positive information about the Thinking Is for Doing other in their self-judgments. Thus, effects did not seem to order to act-how one thinks is profoundly be motivated by a desire to enhance or feel shaped by the options available and what good about the self. Given that a speciic other person ate situation influence which other elements is not oneself, people include speciic others of the associative network are cued.
Thus, in their self-judgments only if the other feels what an identity actually means is likely to close or similar to oneself. Consider a person listening to a lecture. This used in her self-assessments. As reviewed in means that people may experience self and Bless and Schwarz , the direction of identity as stable, failing to notice sensitive the contextual influence can be classiied as adjustment of identity to pragmatics of the assimilation or contrast.
Assimilation occurs situation. Information that informs the standard identity. People were assumed to use others results in a mental process of contrasting automatically as a standard of comparison. To understand when people include thetically. If she is at or above the standard contextually salient information into their set by the focus of her attention, she will judgments about themselves and when they see success as likely for her and recall her exclude this information, using it to form a past as being pretty successful as well.
The inclusion-exclusion model makes the information that comes to mind. For the assimilation-contrast model B l a nton, - example, the audience may include students ; Schwarz et a!. Then the or the target of judgment itself. People are speaker's vitality and the audience's capacity likely to include social information into self can inform her about herself. Thus, whether judgment unless the social information is a person uses contextual information as a marked as different enough from the self contrasting standard on which to judge the that it becomes excluded and is used as a self or assimilates contextual information contrasting standard.
People assume Construction. Often this may be the case. This was dificult. However, unless would shift from one system to the other. However, it also seems likely that later among other constraints. These are the ment include both "me" and "not like that "I just feel it in my gut" kinds of thoughts.
Natural assessments include cepts either external or internally imagined assessment of physical properties e. What comes to mind is likely tive valence e. For example, seeing While the self sion process. In these situations, an identity tancy-value theories Eccles et al. It tion will lead to a behavior that feels right is certainly likely that sometimes people ef- in context.
We to mind and feels relevant in the moment. Human thinking is not and identities on how people think and what invariant and context free; rather, people they do. First, what behavior is important and meaningful. Both the readiness, and interpretation of ease and content and behavioral implications of an dificulty. Children in the alternative relevant behaviors is rarely simple.
Whichever identities means to attain desired and avoid undesired come to mind in the moment and whichever adult identities. But identities are man, , Studies 1 and 2. On the one hand, or independent of school. In follow-up studies, we primed minority The identity-based mouvat1on model e. Like many theories in identities reported higher fatalism about cultural psychology Triandis, , , their future health as adults than children rhe identity-based motivation model predicts in the control group Oyserman, Fryberg, et that differences in identity expression reflect al.
Moreover, smoking, weight gain, and tions in a number of ways. It also trol condition Oyserman, Fryberg, et aL predicts that when behavior feels identity , Studies Self, Self-Concept, and Identity 91 primed relational "us" self-concept results versed it. The idea is dict these effects.
Although both men and that what comes to mind when an identity is women can have social identities based in cued is not simply content but also a general gender, men and women may differ in the way of making sense of the world. Men were predicted to spective "eye of another. People asked tionships. At the same time, saying out loud the color in which the word cross-national differences in judgment and red is printed requires ignoring the semantic decision making that were also emerging meaning as irrelevant.
At the same melneier, Men were more mediation, all implied an important role of likely to report mental imagery separated self-concept structure. Images of oneself having to dynamic construction of identity. They current and future identities are inextricably demonstrated that they could reliably predict linked with feelings of ease or dificulty, and whether people would use more personal or what these feelings mean depends on the social identities to describe themselves by question one asks oneself in regards to the shifting participants' in-the-moment focus feeling.
If the question is "Is this important on themselves as similar to or different from to me? They also showed that interpreted as meaning that the answer is once a personal or social identity focus was "Yes, this is important to me. Otherwise, cued in one situation, it was likely to be used why am I working so hard?
In the past 20 the question is "Is this the real me? This would imply ior. They took on don't take". Those in the "me" condition were less be reinterpreted to mean other things. This replicated the authors' iculty can be viewed as a normative part of secondary analyses of large cross-national the process e. Thus, shifts in identity focus shift have to work for". What dificulty means depends on ing attributed to feelings of ease or dificulty the questions the experience of dificulty is associated with these thoughts see Schwarz, assumed to answer.
Self, Self-Concept, and Identity 93 dent" identity. In Oyserman, Fryberg, et al. But if the question is "Is this really of the world Oyserman et al. In this case, dificulty should result in is highly malleable and situation-sensitive, so which aspect of identity comes to mind is reduced effort.
All children were reminded that When situations cue an identity e. In the no-interpretation condition, is not a ixed list of traits e. Rather, the cued identity carries with a time that a school task was dificult for it a general readiness to act and make sense them.
This does not imply that identities do abilities are ixed rather than malleable not predict behaviors over time but that the Dweck, For effort to matter, one predictive power of an identity depends on must believe that ability is malleable and the stability of the contexts in which it is can be incrementally improved rather than cued. If effort for a related discussion of the stability of matters incremental theory of ability , then attitudes see Schwarz, Rather, identities hierarchy.
Hierarchy research starts with are dynamically constructed in context. Experienced stability allows people tive judgments about the self in an array of to make predictions based on their sense that content domains. This research is the self, and identities being embedded dominated by the study of individualistic within self-concepts. Like other object categories cats, far.
Research on mindsets is a particularly tables , the self is a fuzzy construct. Just as cats vary-some are softer content and consequences.
For example, and more friendly than others but they all an individualistic mindset entails not only share an essential "catness"-people do not using more abstract language to describe always act the same but are in some essential oneself and thinking of oneself as separate way still the same.
The mental content included in the various Moving to what is meant by identity, we "me" selves can be called self-concept. These evaluative to make meaning. Self-esteem and butes, goals and values, and ways of being. Self, Self-Concept, and ldent1ty 95 Confusingly, these are often termed selves identity unless there is reason to use it as a in the social science literature.
First, self, self-concept, and ships, and memberships. How does tities come from and how they matter for this actually happen? Third, self-concept ive and relective processing. Social self-regulation [Special mation as a standard to judge the self only issue: The self and the collective]. Personality under certain circumstances. That is, once and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, Social identity and social processing, what it means depends on the cognition. Hogg Eds. This information is included in the Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Mahwah, NJ havior. Chicago: Dorsey Press. Ajzen, I. Altschul, I. Racial-ethnic identity in mid-adolescence: Boen, F. Dewitte, S. Child Development, 77, 1 1 Politics and basking-in-reflected-glory: Arkes, H. Basic and Appliea ories of behavior. Chauvin Social Psychology, 24, Developmentm Arnett, D. The Review, 21, Rubber hands keting success. Journal of Marketing, 67, "feel" touch that eyes see.
Nature, , Brewer, M. The social self: On being Banaji, M. The self the same and different at the same time. Bandura, A. Ingroup identiication and fying theory of behavioral change. Rutgers Series on Sell Bandura, A. Social cognitive theory: An and Social Identity, 3, Who is chology, 52, The self.
Lindzey Eds. New York: McGraw-Hill. Brewer E. Priming for self-esteem influences Eds. Bronson, M. Self-regulation in early Berger, J. Shifting signals to childhood: Nature and nurture. New York: help health: Using identity signaling to reduce Guilford Press. Journal of Consumer Brown, J. Bernhardt, P. The sociology of the self. Testosterone changes nual Review of Sociology, 29, 3 3. Blanton, H. Self-focusing Ed. Principles of ality and Social Psychology, 88, Destin, M. Sorrentino Eds.
Journal of Experimental tions ofsocial behavior pp. New York: Social Psychology, 46, Guilford Press. Diesendruck, G. Cognitive Regulatory it and persuasion: Transfer from Development, 26, The development of ability cial Psychology, 86, Eccles Eds. New pp. York: Guilford Press. Eccles , ]. Children's social zala, C. Expectancies, functioning and adjustment in the changing values and academic behaviors. Spence Chinese society. San Francisco: Freeman. Elliot, A. Concepts of the self. Cialdini, R.
Self M. Basking and social identity. Social Psychology, 45, Elmore, K. If Cohen, D. As seen by the "we" can succeed, so can "I": Identity-based other. Psychological Science, 1 3 , English, T. For better or for worse: of two forms of consistency. Personality and The impact of upward social comparison on Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, Psychological Bulletin, 1 1 9, Epstein, S. The self-concept revisited or American Psychologist, Cooley, C.
Human nature and the social 2 8 , New York: Scribner's. Erikson, E. Childhood and society. Cousins, S. Culture and self-perception New York: Norton. Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton. Crocetti, E. Feather, N. Expectations and actions: Capturing the dynamics of identity formation Expectancy-value models in psychology. The somewhat social self: nal of Adolescence, 3 1 , How others affect self-appraisals.
Suls Cross, S. Models of the Ed. Psychological Vol. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Bulletin, 1 2 2 , Ferguson, M. Liking is for Cross, W. Pedersen, ]. Draguns, J. Psychology, 87, Trimble Eds. Higgins Eds. Clearing the air: Identity safety mod- pp. New York: Guilford Press. Fitting in but getting fat: Identity Fivush, R. Psychological ogy, 62, Science, 22, Fivush, R. Toward reconceptualizing childhood amnesia. Hudson Eds. Forgas, J. Harter, S. Tangney Eds. Handbook of self and identity pp.
Frable, D. Gender, racial, ethnic, sexual, New York: Guilford Press. Self-discrepancy: A theory differences in judgment. Psychological Review, ence, 10, Gecas, V. The self-concept. Self-discrepancy theory: view of Sociology, 8, What patterns of self-beliefs cause people to Gelman, S.
The role of essentialism in suffer? Higgins, E. Promotion and prevention: Gelman, S. Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. What's in a concept? Zanna Ed. Sigel Ed. Mahwah, Hogg, M.
Social identity. NJ: Erlbaum. The presentation of self in self and identity pp. Leading investigators address this essential construct at multiple levels of analysis, from neural pathways to complex social and cultural dynamics. Coverage includes how individuals gain self-awareness, agency, and a sense of identity; self-related motivation and emotion; the role of the self in interpersonal behavior; and self-development across evolutionary time and the lifespan.
Connections between self-processes and psychological problems are also addressed. New to This Edition Incorporates significant theoretical and empirical advances. Nine entirely new chapters. Coverage of the social and cognitive neuroscience of self-processes; self-regulation and health; self and emotion; and hypoegoic states, such as mindfulness. X Free Shipping on Online Orders! Applies only to prepaid online orders from US customers. You may choose to pay for rush shipping instead. You may return Guilford books undamaged within 30 days of receipt for a full refund.
For bulk orders, please contact: info guilford. Add a Note: Optional.
0コメント